Archive for November, 2011

Kushiel’s Dart: Jacqueline Carey

Nov 28, 2011

When my friend, the writer Sara Douglass, first toured America, she did so with two other wonderful authors: Juliet Marillier and then newcomer, Jacqueline Carey. So taken was Sara with Carey’s work, she brought back copies of her debut novel for me, and our friend, Francis Thiele, and gifted them with the instructions: “you must read this book.” Never one to ignore a directive like that, I did. Oh. My. Recently, I picked this novel up again, to remind myself of what it was I loved about it before reading the sequels… My. My.

This is a sublime and highly erotic tale of a beautiful woman named Phedre who, as a child, is indentured to a guild dedicated to sensuality and the arts of love and where she is taught how to pleasure others with her body. Born with a scarlet mote in her eye (a ‘dart’) the mark of the goddess Kushiel, Phedre is no ordinary courtesan but one who can receive and inflict both pleasure and pain. Highly sought after, it is in the bedchambers and among the other nobles of her land (and foreign dignitaries who desire to experience the arts of one who possesses Kushiel’s Dart), that Phedre’s worth as a lover, spy and keeper and secrets is realized.

The world that Carey has created is sublime, the language of the novel so poetic. You savour words and phrases, appreciate the elegance of the descriptions, and experience the longing that Phedre arouses; the descriptions of pain are visceral and detailed, yet also tantalizingly seductive. Your flesh tingles as you read and your cheeks grow warm – continuing is not for the faint-hearted. Nothing is gratuitous but endowed with meaning and adds to the reader’s understanding of Phedre’s worth in this hedonistic, complex and powerful realm. Carey uses her knowledge of history and politics to create a rich and imaginative world based on Europe during the Middle Ages/Renaissance but with an almost Byzantine feel, where art and poetry are both beautiful and deadly and always valued and where sensuality is a currency. Never unnecessarily graphic, but nonetheless charged with eroticism and heat, this is one of the most original fantasy novels I’ve enjoyed in a while.

It was a terrific read the first time and even better the second.


                    

Book review: Daughter of Smoke and Bone

Nov 28, 2011

Daughter of Smoke and Bone: Liani Taylor

There was a great deal of excited whispering and hyperbole attending this book as well as comparisons to Harry Potter and Twilight. The latter weren’t due to content, which is only similar in that DoSaB is fantasy, but because it’s anticipated that this new series by Laini Taylor will attract the same level of devotion that the others have. Now that I have finished this first book, and had time to draw breath and slow my pounding heart,  I think the pundits are right.

Daughter is a simply stunning read. From its opening pages in a snow-sprinkled Prague to its final, dramatic revelation with the heart-sinking ‘to be continued…’ (I want to know now! *stamps foot*), the story of beautiful, lithe, intelligent blue-haired Karou, the child of a monstrous (literally) wish-monger, Brimstone, who has peculiar friends and an arrogant ex-lover and basically leads a double-life as an art student on the one hand and a procurer of grisly totems on the other, is at once poetic, mysterious, page-turning and heart-wringing. Each and every scene is beautifully set and the mystique surrounding Karou, the girl with the palm-tattoos (and others), who is able to make wishes, speaks dozens of languages, travels the world in the blink of an eye and consorts with other-wordly figures, is gradually revealed. The first half of the book is a tour de force in that regard: like a curtain slowly being raised on a Shakespearean play, the reader is gradually drawn into this world at once recognizable but also just out of reach. Identifying strongly with Karou (the scenes with her and her irrepressible girlfriend are lovely), who knows she is different, but not specifically how or why, we too want the answers she seeks but, up until she is almost killed by a gorgeous but dangerous angel, who’s eyes blaze fire at the same time as they do longing, she’s been content to wait to be told. But when her life is plunged into despair and those she love are engulfed by darkness and horror, she can no longer afford patience.

When Karou (and the reader) gets the answers she’s been searching for her entire life, no-one, least of all Karou, can guess where they’ll take her – physically, psychologically and, above all, emotionally.

I don’t want to give too much away or set up expectations that may be dashed. Needless to say, I couldn’t tear myself away from this read. Well, to be blunt, I couldn’t tear myself away from the first half of the book. Once the love story kicks in earnestly, I was not as captivated. It was here I did feel echoes of Bella and Edward, only (thank goodness) Taylor’s rendering of this relationship was far more mature and the writing and metaphors used to express the first pangs of love and lust were exquisite. Even so, I found the energy that made the first half of the book sing, dampened and I didn’t turn the pages quite as quickly or pick up the book with the eagerness that attended the first half. As Karou’s and Akiva’s backstory unfolds, I also found the to and frying a little clumsy for my taste. But this is being very picky and others won’t agree and may even, if they enjoy long, lingering looks, heaving chests and electric touches, find the love story delightful. Fortunately, as the book reaches its final stages, it redeems itself completely. So, despite my reservations,  this book is indeed magical. Original, fabulously written, wonderfully brought together at the end (which, and I love this, you see coming and can’t do anything to prevent), it is mostly utterly engaging, enthralling and counts as one of the best books of 2011 for me.

Bring on book 2, please!

Stone of Tears by Terry Goodkind: Made me weep

Nov 23, 2011

OK… deep breath. I confess, I didn’t finish the book – I simply couldn’t. The only other book I have done that too in recent memory (though there have probably been others) was Moby Dick! I came to four pages from the end and stopped. I think it was stupidly and meaninglessly to pay back a lecturer who would sit reading swathes of the book and scratching his balls in class, boring and horrifying us in equal measure. Between that and descriptions of whale killing, I’d had enough. :)

Back to this book. I thought I might be the only one who was unable to complete it and so, quickly scanned down some of the other reviews on Goodreads and online generally and noted that there were other people who felt the same way. I also thought I won’t review it because, having left the book unfinished (and with no intention of returning to it) I thought I had no right to offer an opinion. But then, dammit, I thought, it’s only fair to explain why I couldn’t finish it because I am a huge lover of the genre, adored the first book, Wizard’s First Rule (and the television series, Legend of the Seeker) and the fact that many, many people also enjoyed the book meant I couldn’t hurt either the author or put off future readers if I wrote a review. I also made it through about 400 pages – so a sizeable chunk. So here goes… and yes, it has spoilers – sort of…

The book opens with a bloody attack by a vicious eldritch creature in Rahl’s palace. Zed comes to the rescue. Told from the point of view of a child, it’s a bit repetitive, but nonetheless literally, a ripper of an opening. There’s so much blood and graphic descriptions of gore, I found myself questioning it. It seemed to be a little over the top. I’m all for guts and battle in high fantasy. Sure. But there was something about these descriptions that niggled at me in an unpleasant way. Aware this murderous creature was summoned or had escaped from the Underworld, Zed sets off to find Richard ‘before it’s too late’ (no-one says that… that’s just me explaining badly). From there, the story shifts, returning to Richard and Kahlan who, after defeating Darken Rahl in the first book, and learning they can be together despite the fact she’s the Mother Confessor, set off visit the Mud People and get hitched. Only, Richard has torn the veil between the world of the living and dead and creatures from the Underworld, including Rahl, return and life as Richard knows it is once more thrust into heartache and chaos… add to that the creepy Sisters of the Light/Dark, all of whom, for some reason, willingly serve the Keeper (some bloke who will bring about the end of the world and untold pain including, presumably, theirs, which means they’re a bunch of sadomasochists, doesn’t it?), and the stage is set for another saga…

Only, I couldn’t stomach it. There are some wonderful page-turning moments and I felt invested in Richard and Kahlan’s well-being and their romance…to a point. So, perhaps it was because I cared so much that I had to skip ahead, speed-read and basically move through the book faster than I would otherwise have wanted to – which I guess is testimony to Goodkind’s story-telling skills… but I’m not convinced it was due to this alone. Frankly, I found the graphic violence gratuitous and it often did nothing to advance the story – on the contrary, it dominated, adding no real value or depth. In the previous book, when Richard is captured and tortured by the Mord Sith, it’s for a purpose, to bend The Seeker to Rahl’s will, here the violence is simply sadistic and doesn’t serve the narrative and it left me cold and uncomfortable and unable to continue. I just didn’t believe in it – it was like a bad movie – staged for no other purpose than to shock. I was so disappointed.

My son and another friend have told me for years how good these books are and I am so glad they managed to get what I clearly cannot out of them. I feel sad that I will leave Kahlan and Richard’s world now and follow what happens through the reviews (yes, I still want to know what comes next… but the truncated from will do, rather than read the books.

Happy Sever After? Snow White and the enduring power of fairytales

Nov 23, 2011

This is the unedited version of my column which appears in the Courier Mail, Wednesday 23 November 2011

Capitalising on the publicity generated by the second last film in the Twilight saga, Breaking Yawn, I mean, Breaking Dawn: Part One, the trailer for Kristen Stewart’s forthcoming film, Snow White and the Huntsman, has been released.

This latest version of a beloved fairytale (one of two – the other is the comical Mirror, Mirror starring Julia Roberts), with Stewart as Snow White, Charlize Theron as the wicked queen and Australian Chris Hemsworth as the huntsman, purports to offer a different spin on a tried and true tale.

What’s prompted most commentary is not the violence, the fact the film introduces Snow White as more or less an action heroine, or that the prince is relegated to practical obscurity, so much as punters can’t believe anyone would consider Stewart more beautiful than Theron.

As one wit wrote when discovering the casting: “Snow way!”

Ironically, these superficial comments strike at the heart of the original tale and a universal truth. The queen’s obsession with her mirror is not so much about beauty as it’s about the passage of time and the fact that age wearies us all eventually. Even those whose temporary loveliness allows them to wield extraordinary power must pass the baton to younger generations.

That is, unless you have access to magic.

Theron and Stewart simply embody, both in fiction and fact, what’s a contemporary reality, especially in Hollywood where female ageing stars (with few exceptions) find it difficult to secure meaningful roles and big salaries.

More than ever, youth is beauty. It’s a contemporary currency that doesn’t only give women a sense of longevity it keeps us from becoming redundant.

In the Twenty-First century, surgeons are the new wizards and fairies who, with a wave of the magic scalpel, offer the transformations once only possible in the pages of Grimm brothers, Hans Christian Anderson or Charles Perrault. Only now, these modifications occur without the moral lessons; the price they exact is deducted from a bank account.

Is Snow White and the Hunstman going to be one of a rare breed of fairytale remakes, where a valuable moral message is imparted, or have the makers opted for the safety of happily ever after instead?

In retelling any fairytale, producers would do well to look to the source material. Disney claimed to refer to the original tales only to discard their imperatives in favour of a “spoonful of sugar helps the medicine go down.”

There’s no doubt that the 1937 Disney animated version of Snow White, with its domestic goddess, Betty-Boop voiced star who considers work play and elicits the help (as so many Disney heroines are wont to do) of woodland creatures, has gently coloured every one since. Yet, what the story has at its heart (pardon the pun) is, states fairytale expert, Maria Tatar, “a reflection of a young woman’s development.”

In her study of fairytales, Tatar notes the cultural variations in the accounts of Snow White, which appear in Asia, Africa, Europe and the Americas. Considerably bloodthirsty, they feature silver, lead, or jewel-encrusted coffins, apples ingested, suffocating braids, poisoned combs, and the delivery of a variety of the protagonist’s body parts including the lungs, intestines and liver.

Despite these departures from the best-known version, the crux of the story remains the same, which is the reason for the narrative constancy and cultural durability of Snow White.

It relies on a stable core of binary oppositions to relay the tale: birth and death, expulsion (by the queen)/adoption (by the dwarves), jealousy/affection. It also plays out the generational conflict between mother/step-mother and daughter and their vying for the attention/approval of the father or father figure – absent and present.

This latter role is filled by a number of characters from the mirror to the huntsman and the prince.

According to Marina Warner, in her marvellous book, From the Beast to the Blonde, in the original Snow White, before the Grimm brothers meddled, there was no step-mother. It was Snow White’s mother who suffered murderous (sexual) jealousy and persecuted her daughter. Shifting these terrible attributes onto a stepparent fitted with prevailing social (and Christian) attitudes of the time.

Psychologist, Bruno Bettleheim, explains that tales like Snow White do not “stage scenarios that correspond to real life; rather they dramatize projections of trouble brewing in the young child’s mind.” In other words, like all fairytales, they externalise secret fears to make them manageable, to vanquish the beast.

Poet W.H Auden once declared that the Grimm’s fairytales ranked “next to the Bible in importance.”

It’s typical that in times of insecurity and crisis we turn to the proven morality of beloved fairytales. Only what will be interesting is what type of morals and lessons these new versions of Snow White offer.

Will the mirror, mirror of cinema dare to explore the power and struggles of women beyond beauty, or will it simply represent ageing as a female curse we would do anything to lift?

 

Book review: Divergent by Veronica Roth

Nov 21, 2011

I had not heard of this book until I read a simply wonderful review by Mandy Wrangles (a great reviewer, but the way) on the sublime writer, Marianne de Pierres’ Burn Bright website. After absorbing what Mandy wrote, I simply had to read this debut novel by Veronica Roth. I put down Feast of Crows by George Martin (no mean feat to tear me away) intending to get a feel for Divergent. Instead, inhaled this book and have only now come up for air. What a read!

A dystopian tale set in Chicago in a bleak future, it follows the story of Beatrice who, at 16, like all young people in this post-apocalyptic world, has to choose which of the five factions society is now divided into she will belong. Raised in a faction called Abnegation, Beatrice undergoes tests to see whether or not she is more suited to Erudite, Candor, Amity or Dauntless. Each faction lives by the moral and ethical principals its name suggests: the citizens offer a level of effective governance and/or some kind of communal contribution to keep society functioning at a high level. The only thing worse than not belonging to a faction is to be factionless… At least, that’s what is understood at the beginning of the tale. The novel follows Beatrice’s choice, the trials she undergoes as she is initiated and trained, and Beatrice’s (now named Tris) search for identity in a world that insists she and everyone else conforms. Only those who do not, or rather, because of their psychological make-up cannot, conform and are known as ‘divergent’, pose a threat to this ordered world… Or do they?

Leaving behind the life she’s known, Tris makes new friends and enemies quickly. She also learns a great deal about herself, loyalty, fear, honesty and what it means to both love and trust. Trained by the cruel Eric and implacable Four, Tris comes to understand that conformity is also about control and while at one level it appears to offer balance and equity, at another, it gives power to those who can and do abuse it. It also leaves those who trust the powerful to wield it wisely open to exploitation. When Tris stumbles upon a terrible betrayal, she will stop at nothing to try and save those who cannot save themselves. Only, there are those who will do anything to prevent their secret escaping: lie, cheat and even murder…

A sheer roller-coaster from beginning to end, Divergent is original, clever and emotionally centered. The main characters are ones you invest in and better still, believe in. You understand Tris, her strengths and weaknesses and you see the other characters through her generous and honest eyes. Motivations ring true and every action bears consequences and creates a delicious frission.

That Roth is only 23 is fabulous and, for me, adds a depth and credibilty to a work that is so young-people centred. What i mean by that is you have a young adult speculating about a future based on the present – it is written by youth for youth and older readers and I think this deserves mention. Roth has been praised but also, I feel, unfairly scorned on some review sites for not giving as much back-story or explanations as to why the factions exist or characters behave the way they do or accept the status quo. Quite apart from this being the first book in a trilogy, I didn’t struggle with the lack of explanations and quite enjoyed (and felt the narrative invited) the reader to join the dots and engage in supposition. Some of the inconsistencies that readers are wont to point out as faults didn’t rankle with me. I easily became lost in the pace and ‘what ifs’ of the tale – exactly what good speculative fiction should invite readers to do. The voice and earnestness (and fun and devil-may-care) of the narrative rings so true. I am so in awe that she wrote this! There is a rawness and simplicity to this book that leaves it lingering in your imagination. I cannot wait to read the sequel, Insurgent. I’ve no doubt that like the marvellous Hunger Games, this narrative will make it to cinema as well. I hope so. Certainly, if this first book is any indicator, it also deserves a place amongst other wonderful recent dystopian YA novels that have also received wide acclaim such as the above-mentioned’ trilogy by Suzanne Collins and Patrick Ness’ Chaos Walking trilogy – though these latter two possess depths and frission that really becomes apparent when all books are read in sequence – so I am giving Roth the benefit of the doubt and believing that her works too will, when read together, form a whole. Of course, I may be wrong – but that won’t spoil my pleasure in this book!

For anyone who wants a pure dose of adrenalin-charged escapism, read this. I dare you to be able to put it down.

Loss, Grief and the Healing Power of Words

Nov 21, 2011

I have been absent a while, haven’t I? For that I’m so sorry and please, I ask that you read and accept this blog as a rather poor attempt to both apologise  and explain why before I beg your forgiveness and let you know that I’m back and invite you to return as well…

The reason I’ve been gone is twofold: I’ve had several operations this year, related to post-cancer complications, and which mean I now have a pacemaker. It’s been hard to become accustomed to and I’ve had periods of terrible illness and pain. But all that pales by comparison with my second reason for deserting this cyberspace and puts what I’ve been through into perspective – the terrible illness and death of my beloved friend, Sara Warneke who most of you know as the writer Sara Douglass.

Ten and half months ago now, my partner, Stephen, and I shifted temporarily to Hobart, Tasmania, to care for Sara as she tried to deal with the last stages of ovarian cancer. I have written about this elsewhere, mainly in my obituary for Sara on the Voyager website a day after she died.  You can read it here: http://voyagerblog.com.au/2011/09/28/sara-douglass-remembered-by-karen-brooks/

(I should add that Lucy Sussex also wrote the most amazing obituary for Sara that’s appeared in many newspapers.) I also write about Sara – her life, influence and works as well as our relationship that spans twenty years – in the Introduction to the beautiful compilation of her short stories, The Hall of Lost Footsteps, which was published posthumously by Tinconderoga Publications.

Together, these, along with a brief piece I wrote about Sara in Australian Author, explain the months and weeks that led up to her death and give a glimpse into our long-term friendship. What none of these do, however, is elucidate the impact her death has had in other ways and on other people – not just me, but Stephen, her other very close and loving friend (and mine too), Dr Frances Thiele (who adored and was in turn, adored by Sara), or the grief felt by her family, other friends, and loyal fans.

While I always knew the day of Sara’s death would come and, as she became sicker, tried to prepare myself (as did Stephen), it wasn’t until almost a week after she died, that the reality of her absence hit me. She really wasn’t going to phone or text me again. When I went to her house, she wasn’t going to open the door and fold me in one those tight hugs I loved receiving. She was gone… for real. For good. When the realisation struck, I felt like the sun hadn’t gone behind a cloud so much as imploded; as if the lights had gone off in not only my house, but, for the time being, my life, and plunged me into a grey world of shadows and murkiness leaving me to stumble and misapprehend. Sara had been my anchor for the last nine months, my life had been tied to hers in the most intimate and loving of ways and now, suddenly, I was cast adrift. I could no longer talk to her, hold her, share my thoughts and fears, and she couldn’t with me either. A part of my world that, despite the encroaching presence of death was remarkably light and love and hope-filled, had been swallowed by darkness and, worse, an enormous silence that I didn’t see, despite everything being there in front of me, coming. It was the strangest and scariest of sensations. There was not the silence associated with quietude or stillness, but an agitation that had no way of being expressed or relieved. As if the frequency we operated on and within could no longer be tuned. There was only static, no clear signal. Weighed by grief, I swam in circles, barely staying afloat, my ears pricked for a sound, a sign, for a signifier that this lostness was temporary. For Stephen it was the same. We lived and worked in a haze, thinking we were coping when in reality, we were sinking into this hungry silence.

And yet…

Every time we spoke of her, recalled something either with each other, or Fran, or someone else including the many and beautiful homage on FaceBook and other cyber-pages, the silence cracked and the load diminished slightly. Memories came in the most unexpected form and ways. The first time Sara’s cat, Luther, walked into my arms and curled into my neck like he’d always belonged, giving me the audible cuddle that we call a purr, an image of Sara with all her cats surrounding her filled my mind and put me strangely at peace.

I laughed out loud, scaring the other cats and, most of all, myself – but not Luther. After that, each time one of the others came to us for attention, licking, purring, kneading our legs and arms in the way cats do, putting you on edge as you wait for the claws to stick, we found our pain eased and smiles bloomed where tears had once fallen.

Then there were the notes – to me, herself, to others – that we found and treasured. Simple things, like remembering to pay the ‘butcher lady,’ put the bins out, remind Karen about Cromwell (one of the Birmans); there were lists of ‘things to do’ which conjured both sadness and delight at her orderliness; or the folder of recipes that Sara used and which we all enjoyed at her table together, using produce she grew in her garden and which we harvested and cooked as a family. These little paper treasures rip a hole in you when you find them, but then they catapult you back to the moment and the unexpected recall has its own terrible beauty. I loved finding these things, how they would throw us off emotional balance, only to repair our hearts after all. Together, they amounted to a record of a person and life that was rich, complex, giving and simple at the same time – one that we were privileged to share.

When the gardens of Nonsuch began to bloom a few weeks ago, our souls felt renewed. Here was the life that, together, Sara and, later when she became too sick, Stephen under her instructions, planted and nurtured. I felt Sara in every new bud, every blossom that burst into life and colour. Bees hummed, butterflies danced and birds sang while the supine cats, grooming themselves in the sunlight, pretended not to watch them. This was her creation, her gift to everyone, continuing, just like her stories will as well.

After weeks of not being able to conjure a word or creative thought and becoming despondent about that, a story, unbidden but so very welcome, took seed in my mind. I was in, of all places,  a Whisky Distillery when it happened, taking me by complete surprise. I was in no ordinary distillery mind. I was in Larks in Hobart with my sister and her friend who were visiting. This place, like so many others around Hobart, has also become a special part of our shared life with Sara. You see, not long after we arrived here, Stephen and I introduced Sara to the joys of a locally made Whisky liqueur – Slainte – that is made by Larks.

It’s like nothing I have ever tasted before – pure golden sweetness followed by a warm caramel heat that coats your throat before it delivers a small kick below the heart. It is magic. The first time Stephen and I tried it, we knew Sara would love it, and bought her some. We were right. Sara called the woman who made it a goddess and swore it was ambrosia. Stephen would ensure there was always some for Sara and Larks, in a spirit of generosity, not only discounted what we bought, but gave Sara a bottle for free with every order as well. That a simple drink could bring so much pleasure amidst so much pain….

It seems fitting somehow that the first time I returned to this place after Sara died, a place that though Sara had never graced its cosy rooms nonetheless brought her so much comfort and joy, I found a story – the basis for my next novel. It was there, waiting for me, and I accepted the gift of its presence gratefully.

Doing the research and starting the writing process has brought me a healing I never expected. It’s not quick and nor would I want it to be, but it is a sweet and tender ache that brings with it unexpected bouts of sadness followed by moments of sheer joy – joy in the power of words and imagined characters to transport you beyond your own life and propel you into times and places otherwise denied. This is something Sara knew as well and used after her initial diagnosis and towards the end. It might be escapism, but it’s also a blessing. I like to believe, perhaps indulgently, that Sara made sure that tale came to me on that day the way it did. Anyhow, that’s my story and I’m sticking to it.

Every word I write now, I raise an imaginary glass to my darling friend: Slainte Sara.

So, there you have it.  That’s why I’ve been absent from my website and blog – I retreated for a time, firstly to begin my own process of recovery and then to care for a friend who needed me, needed Stephen too. That I needed her just as much was always apparent to me, but her death has made that awareness acute and hard to overcome. She didn’t choose to leave me, us, this life, her life, and that’s why I’ve struggled so hard with her absence: the unjustness of it. What I didn’t expect was that, just as she was in life, she’s there beside me in death and, in my writing, whether it be this blog or the stories I have yet to tell, she will be with me every syllable of the way.

There you are, my friends. I am back. I hope you forgive me. After all, we have a journey to take and I have many tales to tell…

Thank you.